Speciality Code:


Speciality Name:

Forensic economic examination



  • Model of graduating student
  • Mandatory disciplines
  • Elective disciplines
  • Professional
interpret the concept of offense, to differentiate a criminal offense from others, to determine the composition of the criminal offense, crime;
to explain the types of proceedings under the Kazakh legislation, to understand the objectives of each stage of the proceedings, the subject of proof, types of proceedings, their basic rules;
to interpret the criminalistic characteristics of crimes, to possess forensic techniques of collecting material traces and their ability to establish the circumstances of the cases;
understand the role of tactics in the conduct of procedural actions, the importance of modern forensic technologies in the disclosure and investigation of cases;
to systematize normative legal acts in accordance with the principles of organization, functions,tasks of expert activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan;
to highlight the procedural aspects of complex, repeated, single member Commission of dopolnitelnymi;
to assess the rights and duties of a forensic expert during the examination;
to justify the structure of the expert opinion and its evidentiary value;
to substantiate the distinctive features of forensic economic expertise as a form of application of special knowledge in the field of forensic accounting and as a source of evidence;
to justify the classification of judicial economic expertise;
disclose the subject, objects and tasks of forensic accounting expertise;
to reveal the subject, objects and tasks of forensic-financial-economic(financial-budgetary, financial-credit) expertise
explain the methodological foundations of forensic economic expertise as the integration of scientific and applied knowledge of economic Sciences and other fields;
explain the reasons for the appointment and conduct of judicial economic expertise;
to justify the value of the case materials (Protocol of interrogation of the expert opinion of handwriting experts–commodity researchers, technologists etc.) for the appointment and conducting forensic economic expertise;
to reveal the possibilities, goals and objectives of accounting analysis methods, methods of economic analysis and methods of documentary analysis;
explain the scientific and methodological basis for solving problems of forensic accounting expertise;
to explain scientifically-methodical bases of the solution of tasks of the judicial, fiscal examination;
to explain scientifically-methodical bases of solving of tasks of forensic financial examination;
explain the scientific and methodological basis for solving problems of forensic engineering and economic expertise and other types of economic expertise;
identify accounting inconsistencies, discrepancies in accounting data on the receipt and consumption of property values;
to determine the discrepancy between the data of synthetic accounting and reporting to the primary documents on the posting of finished products, the final indicators for production;
to determine the distortion of indicators of reporting on output in primary and final documents;
define the period of accounting data discrepancy;
determine the amount of overstatement of write-off of materials in a certain period, etc.;
analyze the financial condition and solvency of the organization (enterprise);
to set negative variances (underpayments, overpayments) for individual income and areas of expenditure of funds;
determine the validity of the formation and expenditure of cash funds;
to reveal the facts of violations of the order of formation and use of monetary funds;
determine the Commission of financial transactions, hidden from the state profits, unjustified contributions to cash funds;
identify illegal operations with securities, investments;
identify violations of credit and financial discipline in the work of the Bank branch with creditable commercial organizations and depositors, etc.;
determine the creditworthiness of the borrower;
to establish the validity of the provision and the intended use of credits;
to determine the completeness and timeliness of repayment of borrowed funds; to identify compliance (discrepancy) of the direction of expenditure of funds to their intended purpose;
resolve issues related to the reasonableness of pension accrual;
determine the validity of a certain method of public procurement, etc.;
participate in research activities, including in the context of self-elected, theoretically and practically significant, in-demand judicial and investigative practice;
engage in innovative teaching activities in the aspect of the necessary organization and implementation of self-education and training;
use in expert research, scientific research achievements of computer technology;
develop, generate and implement projects to create new knowledge of all-court economic expertise;
to assess the relationship between the production of judicial economic expertise, research, scientific and methodological forms of activity;
to draw a conclusion about the relationship between the principles of the organization of expert activity and the legal norms on the assignment of qualification certificates for the right to conduct economic forensic examinations, periodic certification of forensic experts;
explain the relationship between the principles of the organization of expert activities and legal norms for testing methods, validation of methods, techniques;
to show the role of integration of scientific knowledge in solving issues of development of judicial economic expertise;
evaluate the results of expert research and formulate conclusions in accordance with the General methodology of analysis and evaluation of the identified information;
to argue the relationship between the tasks and the competence of the expert;
justify the written refusal of the expert from the examination or his request;
to interpret complex expertise as integration of knowledge of different expert specialties;
determine the validity of the appointment of re-examinations;
to present the results of the step-by-step study and applied methods in conclusion;
during interrogations during the investigation, court proceedings it is reasonable to argue the expert opinions;
work in a team, find compromises and correlate your opinion with the opinion of the team; possess positive communication skills based on the principles of patriotism, citizenship and tolerance;
be able to self-study at the end of the training program, to expand their knowledge on the basis of information and educational technologies; willingness to work in a multinational and multicultural team;
  Data for 2017-2020 years
  Data for 2017-2020 years
  Data for 2017-2020 years