Speciality Code:


Speciality Name:

Forensic philological examination



  • Model of graduating student
  • Mandatory disciplines
  • Elective disciplines
  • Professional
ON1 interpret the concept of offense, to differentiate a criminal offense from others, to determine the composition of the criminal offense, crime;
to explain the types of proceedings under the Kazakh legislation, to understand the objectives of each stage of the proceedings, the subject of proof, types of proceedings, their basic rules;
to interpret the criminalistic characteristics of crimes, to possess forensic techniques of collecting material traces and their ability to establish the circumstances of the cases;
understand the role of tactics in the conduct of procedural actions, the importance of modern forensic technologies in the disclosure and investigation of cases;
to systematize normative legal acts in accordance with the principles of organization and functions,tasks of expert activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan;
to highlight the procedural features of integrated, re-sole, Commission fees, dopolnitelnymi;
to assess the rights and duties of a forensic expert during the examination;
ON2 explain the reasons for the appointment and conduct of judicial philological examination;
to justify the structure of the expert opinion and its evidentiary value;
to explain the integrative processes forming the area of knowledge "judicial philological expertise" in forensic expert studies»;
ON3 to formulate methodological principles of multilateral, complex linguistic research of speech work for solving problems of legal proceedings;
to demonstrate the relationship of speech activity with individual and social characteristics of the individual;
to interpret the functioning of text unity in the conditions of dynamic speech communication;
to show the ways of language representation of communicative intention of the author of a speech work;
show the distinction between the actual language and the individual in language and speech;
interpret the principles of modern linguistics and their implementation in the study of conflict text
ON4 give a description of the mechanisms of generation and understanding of units of different types of discourse; explain how to transmit negative information;
to interpret the methodology of linguistic analysis of the content-semantic and formal side of a speech work;
to interpret the method of extracting factual and personal information about communicants and conditions of text generation from a speech work;
interpret the distinction between statements of fact and expressions of opinion;
factors that determine the individuality of speech manifestations, explain the relative stability of speech manifestations.
ON5 to apply terminology in the field of expert activity, to choose methods and means of ensuring the production of expertise;
be aware of the consequences of violation of confidentiality, integrity and availability of information;
classify methods of discourse analysis of language;
to solve the problem of the content of negative information about persons, as touching the honor and dignity of the person as diminishing business reputation or lack of such information, to solve the problem of the presence or absence of words, phrases or phrases relating to one or more types of offensive language;
identify statements calling for any hostile or violent action against persons of any nationality, denomination, race, statements calling for the overthrow of the constitutional order, etc.;
ON6 identify statements containing criminal information on offers to sell narcotic or psychotropic substances or to smuggle or transfer bribes, etc.;
to solve the problem of identification of the author of the text, contributing to the establishment of evidence in proving;
to diagnose the personal abilities of the author of the text – gender, age, profession, mental state, etc.;
ON7 identify the most significant and significant genre, psycholinguistic and stylistic features of the text of the publication (title);
to determine the compositional structure of the text of articles (articles), artistic techniques used by the author, and how they characterize the heroes of the publication;
to determine automoblog and the degree of plagiarism;
ON8 participate in research activities, including in the context of self-elected, theoretically and practically significant, in-demand judicial and investigative practice;
engage in innovative teaching activities in the aspect of the necessary organization and implementation of self-education and training;
use in expert research, scientific research achievements of computer technology;
develop, generate and implement projects to create new knowledge in the field of philological expertise;
ON9 to assess the relationship between the production of expertise, research, scientific and methodological forms of activity;
to draw a conclusion about the relationship between the principles of the organization of expert activity and the legal norms on the assignment of qualification certificates for the right to conduct forensic examinations, periodic certification of forensic experts;
explain the relationship between the principles of the organization of expert activities and legal norms for testing methods, validation of methods, techniques;
to show the relationship between the borderline linguistic areas: cognitive linguistics (based on the concept of strategy, macro and microstructure of discourse), communicative linguistics (considering the produced and perceived text as a set of interrelated characteristics), functional and communicative language description, scientific provisions of the theory of forensic examination in solving issues of forensic philological examinations;
to analyze the conflictogenic aspect of evaluative statements and the problems of their research.
ON10 evaluate the results of expert research and formulate conclusions in accordance with the General methodology of analysis and evaluation of speech manifestations;
to argue the relationship between the tasks to be solved and the competence of an expert philologist;
to justify the written refusal of the examination and the expert's request;
to interpret complex psihofiziologicheskie, physiological, phonoscopic expertise as an integration of knowledge of different expert disciplines, including Philology, linguistics;
to determine the validity of the re-appointment of philological expertise;
ON11 to present the results of the step-by-step study and applied methods in conclusion;
during interrogations during the investigation, court proceedings it is reasonable to argue the expert opinions;
ON12 work in a team, find compromises and correlate your opinion with the opinion of the team; possess positive communication skills based on the principles of patriotism, citizenship and tolerance;
be able to self-study at the end of the training program, to expand their knowledge on the basis of information and educational technologies;
willingness to work in a multinational and multicultural team, ;
  Data for 2017-2020 years
  Data for 2017-2020 years
  Data for 2017-2020 years